Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies

The journal "Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies" focuses on the research about enterprise and work innovation, and that is organised interdisciplinary with economics, sociology, managerial, ergonomics and S&T policy approaches. It aims to study innovative systems both at the company level (networks, management, mergers and competition frameworks, quality systems, strategy, policy framework), and at the labour systems level (organization, labour relations, ergonomics and safety, telework), as well the issues related with technology assessment, systems management and innovation policy.

The main fields covered by the journal are:

IET that sponsors the journal is a research centre pole of CESNOVA which covers this inter-disciplinary field and has the financial support from the Portuguese Ministry of Science and Technology through the national Foundation for Science and Technology.

Editorial Committee

Director: António Brandão Moniz (FCT-UNL, CICS.NOVA)
Editor: José Maria Albuquerque (CICS.NOVA, INSA)

Editorial board:

Issues (2005-2014)

2014, Volume 10, Issue 10

2013, Volume 9, Issue 9

2012, Volume 8, Issue 8

2011, Volume 7, Issue 7

2010, Volume 6, Issue 6

2009, Volume 5, Issue 5

2008, Volume 4, Issue 4

2007, Volume 3, Issue 3

2006, Volume 2, Issue 2

2005, Volume 1, Issue 1

Open Access

This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.

Ethics

"Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies" is a peer-reviewed journal and the publication of an article in such a szstem is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method.

Duties of authors

• Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review and professional publication articles should also be accurate and objective, and editorial ‘opinion’ works should be clearly identified as such.

• Originality and plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism takes many forms, from ‘passing off’ another’s paper as the author’s own paper, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another’s paper (without attribution), to claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

• Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

• In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.

Publication of some kinds of articles (e.g. clinical guidelines, translations) in more than one journal is sometimes justifiable, provided certain conditions are met. The authors and editors of the journals concerned must agree to the secondary publication, which must reflect the same data and interpretation of the primary document. The primary reference must be cited in the secondary publication.

• Acknowledgement of sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Information obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. Information obtained in the course of confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, must not be used without the explicit written permission of the author of the work involved in these services.

• Authorship of the paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

• Hazards and human or animal subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript. If the work involves the use of animal or human subjects, the author should ensure that the manuscript contains a statement that all procedures were performed in compliance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines and that the appropriate institutional committee(s) has approved them. Authors should include a statement in the manuscript that informed consent was obtained for experimentation with human subjects. The privacy rights of human subjects must always be observed.

• Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. If the editor or the publisher learns from a third party that a published work contains a significant error, it is the obligation of the author to promptly retract or correct the paper or provide evidence to the editor of the correctness of the original paper.

Conflict of interest

All authors are requested to disclose any actual or potential conflict of interest including any financial, personal or other relationships with other people or organizations within three years of beginning the submitted work that could inappropriately influence, or be perceived to influence, their work.

Journal Articles by Total File Downloads

Statistics

March 2015:

File Downloads                                                                     Abstract Views

There are currently 68 items in this series, of which 68 are downloadable.

Information at

 

at RUN

and at Directory of Open Access Journals 

BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine

ISSN

ISSN 1646-1223 (printed version)

ISSN 2182-5114 (electronic version)

Impact factor

RePEc services sent on March 3rd, 2019, their most recent detailed statistics on our journal "Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies"

There are currently 68 items in this series, of which 68 are downloadable.

On the AIF: Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y have been the following in the most recent years:

2012 - 0.58

2013 - 0.71

2014 - 0.81

Simple Impact Factor:

2019 - 0.50 (average for 10 years)

On the IF: Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y (C2Y: Cites into articles published in y-1 plus y-2, and D2Y: Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2), we have the following:

2009 - 0.06

2013 - 0.11

2015 - 0.18

Most cited articles in EWIS series (until Dec 2015)

Most cited documents in this series: