Publications

Export 9 results:
Sort by: Author [ Title  (Asc)] Type Year
A B C D [E] F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z   [Show ALL]
E
Cerqueira, NMFSA, Gonzalez PJ, Brondino CD, Romao MJ, Romao CC, Moura I, Moura JJG.  2009.  The Effect of the Sixth Sulfur Ligand in the Catalytic Mechanism of Periplasmic Nitrate Reductase. Journal of Computational Chemistry. 30:2466-2484., Number 15 AbstractWebsite
n/a
Cunha, CA, Romao MJ, Sadeghi SJ, Valetti F, Gilardi G, Soares CM.  1999.  Effects of protein-protein interactions on electron transfer: docking and electron transfer calculations for complexes between flavodoxin and c-type cytochromes. Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry. 4:360-374., Number 3 AbstractWebsite
n/a
Watson, C, Niks D, Hille R, Vieira M, Schoepp-Cothenet B, Marques AT, Romão MJ, Santos-Silva T, Santini JM.  2017.  Electron transfer through arsenite oxidase: Insights into Rieske interaction with cytochrome c. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics. 1858:865-872., Number 10 AbstractWebsite

Arsenic is a widely distributed environmental toxin whose presence in drinking water poses a threat to >140 million people worldwide. The respiratory enzyme arsenite oxidase from various bacteria catalyses the oxidation of arsenite to arsenate and is being developed as a biosensor for arsenite. The arsenite oxidase from Rhizobium sp. str. NT-26 (a member of the Alphaproteobacteria) is a heterotetramer consisting of a large catalytic subunit (AioA), which contains a molybdenum centre and a 3Fe-4S cluster, and a small subunit (AioB) containing a Rieske 2Fe-2S cluster. Stopped-flow spectroscopy and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) have been used to better understand electron transfer through the redox-active centres of the enzyme, which is essential for biosensor development. Results show that oxidation of arsenite at the active site is extremely fast with a rate of >4000s−1 and reduction of the electron acceptor is rate-limiting. An AioB-F108A mutation results in increased activity with the artificial electron acceptor DCPIP and decreased activity with cytochrome c, which in the latter as demonstrated by ITC is not due to an effect on the protein-protein interaction but instead to an effect on electron transfer. These results provide further support that the AioB F108 is important in electron transfer between the Rieske subunit and cytochrome c and its absence in the arsenite oxidases from the Betaproteobacteria may explain the inability of these enzymes to use this electron acceptor.

Silva, JM, Cerofolini L, Carvalho AL, Ravera E, Fragai M, Parigi G, Macedo AL, Geraldes CFGC, Luchinat C.  2023.  Elucidating the concentration-dependent effects of thiocyanate binding to carbonic anhydrase, 2023. 244:112222. AbstractWebsite

Many proteins naturally carry metal centers, with a large share of them being in the active sites of several enzymes. Paramagnetic effects are a powerful source of structural information and, therefore, if the native metal is paramagnetic, or it can be functionally substituted with a paramagnetic one, paramagnetic effects can be used to study the metal sites, as well as the overall structure of the protein. One notable example is cobalt(II) substitution for zinc(II) in carbonic anhydrase. In this manuscript we investigate the effects of sodium thiocyanate on the chemical environment of the metal ion of the human carbonic anhydrase II. The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) titration of the cobalt(II) protein with thiocyanate shows that the EPR spectrum changes from A-type to C-type on passing from 1:1 to 1:1000-fold ligand excess. This indicates the occurrence of a change in the electronic structure, which may reflect a sizable change in the metal coordination environment in turn caused by a modification of the frozen solvent glass. However, paramagnetic nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) data indicate that the metal coordination cage remains unperturbed even in 1:1000-fold ligand excess. This result proves that the C-type EPR spectrum observed at large ligand concentration should be ascribed to the low temperature at which EPR measurements are performed, which impacts on the structure of the protein when it is destabilized by a high concentration of a chaotropic agent.

Barroca-Ferreira, J, Cruz-Vicente P, Santos MFA, Rocha SM, Santos-Silva T, Maia CJ, Passarinha LA.  2021.  Enhanced Stability of Detergent-Free Human Native STEAP1 Protein from Neoplastic Prostate Cancer Cells upon an Innovative Isolation Procedure. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 22, Number 18 AbstractWebsite

Background: The STEAP1 is a cell-surface antigen over-expressed in prostate cancer, which contributes to tumor progression and aggressiveness. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying STEAP1 and its structural determinants remain elusive. Methods: The fraction capacity of Butyl- and Octyl-Sepharose matrices on LNCaP lysates was evaluated by manipulating the ionic strength of binding and elution phases, followed by a Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) polishing. Several potential stabilizing additives were assessed, and the melting temperature (Tm) values ranked the best/worst compounds. The secondary structure of STEAP1 was identified by circular dichroism. Results: The STEAP1 was not fully captured with 1.375 M (Butyl), in contrast with interfering heterologous proteins, which were strongly retained and mostly eluted with water. This single step demonstrated higher selectivity of Butyl-Sepharose for host impurities removal from injected crude samples. Co-IP allowed recovering a purified fraction of STEAP1 and contributed to unveil potential physiologically interacting counterparts with the target. A Tm of  55 °C was determined, confirming STEAP1 stability in the purification buffer. A predominant α-helical structure was identified, ensuring the protein’s structural stability. Conclusions: A method for successfully isolating human STEAP1 from LNCaP cells was provided, avoiding the use of detergents to achieve stability, even outside a membrane-mimicking environment.

Bras, JLA, Carvalho AL, Viegas A, Najmudin S, Alves VD, Prates JAM, Ferreira LMA, Romao MJ, Gilbert HJ, Fontes CMGA.  2012.  ESCHERICHIA COLI EXPRESSION, PURIFICATION, CRYSTALLIZATION, AND STRUCTURE DETERMINATION OF BACTERIAL COHESIN-DOCKERIN COMPLEXES. Cellulases. 510(Gilbert, H. J., Ed.).:395-415. Abstract
n/a
Laber, B, GomisRuth FX, Romao MJ, Huber R.  1992.  ESCHERICHIA-COLI DIHYDRODIPICOLINATE SYNTHASE - IDENTIFICATION OF THE ACTIVE-SITE AND CRYSTALLIZATION. Biochemical Journal. 288:691-695. AbstractWebsite
n/a
Carvalho, AL, Dias FMV, Nagy T, Prates JAM, Proctor MR, Smith N, Bayer EA, Davies GJ, Ferreira LMA, Romao MJ, Fontes CMGA, Gilbert HJ.  2007.  Evidence for a dual binding mode of dockerin modules to cohesins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 104:3089-3094., Number 9 AbstractWebsite
n/a
Terao, M, Garattini E, Romão MJ, Leimkühler S.  2020.  Evolution, expression, and substrate specificities of aldehyde oxidase enzymes in eukaryotes, 2020. Journal of Biological ChemistryJournal of Biological Chemistry. 295(16):5377-5389.: Elsevier AbstractWebsite

Aldehyde oxidases (AOXs) are a small group of enzymes belonging to the larger family of molybdo-flavoenzymes, along with the well-characterized xanthine oxidoreductase. The two major types of reactions that are catalyzed by AOXs are the hydroxylation of heterocycles and the oxidation of aldehydes to their corresponding carboxylic acids. Different animal species have different complements of AOX genes. The two extremes are represented in humans and rodents; whereas the human genome contains a single active gene (AOX1), those of rodents, such as mice, are endowed with four genes (Aox1-4), clustering on the same chromosome, each encoding a functionally distinct AOX enzyme. It still remains enigmatic why some species have numerous AOX enzymes, whereas others harbor only one functional enzyme. At present, little is known about the physiological relevance of AOX enzymes in humans and their additional forms in other mammals. These enzymes are expressed in the liver and play an important role in the metabolisms of drugs and other xenobiotics. In this review, we discuss the expression, tissue-specific roles, and substrate specificities of the different mammalian AOX enzymes and highlight insights into their physiological roles.Aldehyde oxidases (AOXs) are a small group of enzymes belonging to the larger family of molybdo-flavoenzymes, along with the well-characterized xanthine oxidoreductase. The two major types of reactions that are catalyzed by AOXs are the hydroxylation of heterocycles and the oxidation of aldehydes to their corresponding carboxylic acids. Different animal species have different complements of AOX genes. The two extremes are represented in humans and rodents; whereas the human genome contains a single active gene (AOX1), those of rodents, such as mice, are endowed with four genes (Aox1-4), clustering on the same chromosome, each encoding a functionally distinct AOX enzyme. It still remains enigmatic why some species have numerous AOX enzymes, whereas others harbor only one functional enzyme. At present, little is known about the physiological relevance of AOX enzymes in humans and their additional forms in other mammals. These enzymes are expressed in the liver and play an important role in the metabolisms of drugs and other xenobiotics. In this review, we discuss the expression, tissue-specific roles, and substrate specificities of the different mammalian AOX enzymes and highlight insights into their physiological roles.