<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>13</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kuhlmann, Stefan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Boekholt, Patries</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Georghiou, Luke</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Guy, Ken</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Heraud, Jean-Alain</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Laredo, Philippe</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lemola, Tarmo</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Loveridge, Denis</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Luukkonen, Terttu</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">António Moniz</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Polt, Wolfgang</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rip</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">{Improving Distributed Intelligence in Complex Innovation Systems}</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">assessment</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">evaluation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology foresight</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology policy</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1999</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jun</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/6426.html</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6426</style></number><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University Library of Munich, Germany</style></publisher><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Science and technology (S&amp;amp;T) are considered to be a central source, or at least a basic medium, of societal and industrial innovation, while innovation is conceived to basically feed the regeneration of our welfare. The suppliers of S&amp;amp;T in Europe as well as the users of their „products“, are confronted with a number of challenges today. We want to stress here that it was not the primary goal of our Advanced Science &amp;amp; Technology Policy Planning (ASTPP) Network to come up with proposals how the strategic character of European S&amp;amp;T policies could be strengthened. The ASTPP-network instead focuses on one aspect: the provision of strategic intelligence necessary to identify and develop strategic choices. The underlying hypothesis is that the existing body of experiences with technology foresight, technology assessment and S/T policy evaluation provides a basis for the development of an advanced S&amp;amp;T policy „planning“ approach by trying to enhance, interlink or even integrate the growing, but still dispersed experience in these three areas of intelligence. By „intelligent“ we mean that the inter-relatedness of S&amp;amp;T, industrial efforts, societal needs and political interventions becomes more transparent so that interactive collaboration between them will be facilitated.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MPRA Paper</style></work-type><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">n/a</style></notes></record></records></xml>